"Downfall" Parody: Hitler becomes frustrated with his Liberal Democrats in Todmorden (MUST WATCH)3/1/2014 You must have seen the popular Youtube parodies, including "Hitler wants a Marina", well a new one has been uploaded making fun of the Todmorden Liberal Democrats who realise they are going to lose Todmorden Ward.
2 Comments
People have been asking me my opinion over what is going on in the Ukraine, and that’s not an easy question to answer, and it’s hard to know where to begin. I would suggest for a start that we should be suspicious of any civil unrest which is designed to destabilise relations within the Russian sphere of influence. Putin is no nationalist but the west hates him because he has sabotaged the United State’s plans to escalate civil war in Syria, another client of the Russian Federation. That is the “one-two punch” with which the West usually deals with Russia, last used in Egypt and Hungary in the 1950’s. That said, neither Putin nor Yanukivovic are friends of the white cause, nor for that matter is Belarus. Putin is at best a Russian nationalist in the tradition of the old Soviet Empire once Stalin has weeded the jews out of his politburo. Anti-jewish but by no means pro-white. However there is the fact that our dog in the fight (concerning Ukrainian politics), the Svboda Party, had decided to throw its lot in with the “pro-Democracy” demonstrators led by the Armenian jewess Yulia Tymoshenko. Does that mean we do not stand by them, as we stood by Golden Dawn in Greece? I argue no. When there is a major conflict which engulfs the nation you have to pick a side, and it is up to the Ukrainian Nationalists to decide which side they pick, not us sitting in our armchairs. You simply do not sit on the fence is an issue like this (as the cowardly UKIP did here over the Iraq war, torn by populists sentiment on the one hand, and jingoistic Tory bigwigs on the other), you have to decide which side you would like to see win and develop a perspective for what you want to see happen. So, when Putin is fighting the Chechens, we should support Putin. When Serbs are up against the Albanians, we should support the Serbs. Now the Ukrainians are up against the new Soviets we should support the Ukrainians. Yes, Cheryl All, the supermodel girlfriend of our mentally-tormented Coun. Chris Baksa has been at it again. Great minds think alike, so alike it seems that these two happen to make the same identical spelling mistakes and errors. However, we mentioned another IP address - well it appears that belongs to Philip Walters, a man who seems to be determined to take some of the heat off his friend Chris Baksa. Anybody that compares the format of typing on these two facebook pages will recognise the same mistakes. One thing is the lazy use of spacing and forgetfulness regarding the CAPS lock on the computer.
In his hey day Philip Walters was a seat-warmer for the Liberal Democrats in the Town Hall, back when the Liberal Democrats couldn't lose. He can usually be found in the local pub running his mouth off about the immigrants and lesbians, yes another hypoctite. He was recently replaced as the candidate for the safe seat of Stoodley in the last by-election by a Pakistani, Zaheer Abbas. Philip got a good hiding from the NF in said recent by-election, coming in with 10.3% behind the NF with 11.5%, and has been lashing out at me ever since, because of my support for Chris Jackson. He forgets that he was happy to back Rabbi Taylor up and put his face to the Cornholme by-election witch hunt against me. That's where I got 14%. In the interests of care in the community, I am inviting all Toddites of Goodwill to endorse this noble cause. https://www.facebook.com/sectionbaksa Below is the link to our original article exposing, with evidence, his confused state of mind as an anti-immigrant, anti-homosexual, anti-EU hard-liner one moment, and an uber-liberal campaigner against evil wicked nationalists like me the next.
He has posted more mesages to me under the familiar names of "Kay", "Jenny" and "Josh" as well as his imaginary supporter"Cheryl" knowing full well from reading my last article that I can see his IP address from my side of the dashboard. Yes my friends, it's the same IP address (and I enclose a screenshot as proof). Note the same spelling mistakes. Joe Rez, his best buddy on the council can defend this nitwit all he wants, but it shows how desperate the Lib-Dems as a party really are. http://fighting-back-todmorden.weebly.com/2/post/2014/02/is-coun-baksa-one-step-away-from-being-sectioned-judge-for-yourself.html Coming at it from an Independent point of view, I would say that there are a lot of other people who are de-facto Independents too who are passing themselves off as a movement or party when they only have a handful of followers. At the moment I am lumping the “Civic Nationalist” types and the keyboard warriors in there as well as the bulk of these so-called political parties are of no use to us as a struggle whatsoever. For one example let me take “Stephan Toth”, the self-styled “Modern Nationalist”. He runs a website that nobody reads and hangs around in facebook groups trying desperately to get people to read whatever he is rambling on the day.
I would also argue at this point that there are grouplets that are reasonably effective in one area such as the Brittanica Party in Glasgow. This small group of people have run for office in Glasgow and are, I am sure effective, but are they a political movement? Again, no. They are a local pressure group active in local politics. I was involved in two “Unity” projects that were aimed at creating a movement in Great Britain. 1. The Nationalist Alliance: This was an alliance of the White Nationalist Party, England First Party, Wolf’s Hook White Brotherhood, Spearhead Support Group and several active Independents. The typical member was one who had left the BNP in 1999 and had unsuccessfully attempted to revive the National Front, and unashamedly racial. This party was active in supporting the late John Tyndall, who was ostracised from the inner circles of the BNP during the race-hate trials, this movement was poised to be the alternative to the BNP years before the NF made it’s comeback. So what killed it? Poor leadership and internal splits after the unexpected death of John Tyndall were the primary factors, but also the BNP was still gaining traction and over though the principled nationalists felt they were better off staying put. The party split and ultimately folded to be replaced by the British People’s Party. 2. The Nationalist Unity Forum. This was a series of meetings put together by Dr. Jim Lewthwaite who had left the BNP after the 2010 General Election, to set up the Democratic Nationalists. This party was highly active in Bradford and Dr. Lewtwaite began linking up with other small patriotic outfits, including the intellectual speaking circuit in London, to try and build up an alternative to the BNP. Once he had obtained the backing of ex-BNP members from the North East of England and the ex-BNP Yorkshire and Humberside MEP Andrew Brons, they founded a new party but this has struggled to take off. My involvement in this was not welcomed by the hierarchy of this drive as I was considered “too extreme”, though I had spoken at some of their meetings and obtained some support on an individual, one to one level. Also the party I was representing (the British People’s Party) did not appreciate me supporting this effort and they were forging links with the National Front - a party they eventually ended up merging into. Other than the BNP and the National Front, those are the only nationalist parties that have the right to call themselves a movement. Here is how I judge a “movement”. · The party must have an active leadership. · The party must be represented in every region of the country with an active regional leadership. · The party must be represented in a sizeable number of counties by an active county leadership. · The party must be able to make news and turn out activists on short notice in any area of the county. · The party must be seeking to unify and engage with the wider public. · The party must have an inventory of tactics and use all of them regularly, be it meetings, fighting elections, demonstrations or what have you. · The party must be making progress at the ballot box, and not permanently in decline. · The Party must possess and distribute regular literature to the public as well as internally. I believe that to have a movement we have to be seen as putting out a unified message, and give hope to our people. I think we should forget the keyboard warriors, those trying to sell their wares and crackpots with single a issue agenda of their own. And it goes without saying we must exclude those who commit miscegenation and sexual perversion as well as followers of any of the Jewish political movements. I think that if we start bringing these activists, independents and micro parties together who are doing their own bit as a loose association with a common set of criteria (as above) we can ditch the time-wasters and kick start this movement up again. Either independently of the existing parties or as a supporting back-up reserve. This is the Abraham Ormerod Building in it's glory days, and I would consider this building, given to the town by Mr. Ormerod himself as much a part of the heritage of Todmorden as the Town Hall or the Christ Church. I am not going to go too heavily into the political ramifications as I have covered this in previous articles and wrote about this extensively in my "Fighting Back" newsletter, other than to say that I was in favour of the building of a much larger supermarket on the Halifax Road, on a site that badly needs developing. I have always remained consistent on my attitude towards the Ormerod Building. It is ours, it was stolen from us in 1974 and has been deliberately allowed to rot. Apart from Dr. Shipman's one-time presence I have fond memories of the town Christmas tree, nativity and lights of this monument. Those in politics say that this building ceased to be ours when the Yorkshire Area Health Authority (after that the Calderale/ Kirklees NHS Trust) took direct ownership after Todmorden Municipal Borough Corporation ceased to exist as a result of Ted Heath decimating the local Government structure. I still maintain this building was not theirs to sell. Had a private residential dwelling been allowed to fall into the condition this building has, the owner would have been prosecuted. Never mind a Section 215 now, this needed to have been dealt with back then. It seems we have one rule for the public sector, another for the private sector. I think, for me personally, we are due some thirty to forty years worth of rent, plus compensation, and the transfer of this site back to the Todmorden Council, even in it's present status as an emaciated Civil Parish. Or let the Central Government refurbish it and sign it back to us, and then we can call it quits. Are we to believe that there was absolutely no way for buildings like this entrusted to their local Council to remain in local hands? Were there no clauses in the Local Government Act of 1973 that dealt with these circumstances? Was the Ormerod building the only such building ever to be caught up in this? Believe that if you want to. Whatever your perspective on proposed supermarkets, whatever you think should be the fate of this building now. Surely you would agree with me that we have been robbed of a piece of our heritage, and that some heads must roll for this. Councillor Chris Baksa, has taken to creating false internet friends to back him up, including a supermodelcalled "Cheryl All", to a man named "John Fielden" and a Manchester gangland boss called "Josh". They make up his Anti National Front in Tod Campaign. I think somebody needs to explain to him that I haven't been a member of the NF since 2004. The Todmorden Liberal Democrats are moving in ever-decreasing circles it appears. Having exposed Joe Rez's star Councillor Chris Baksa for being two-faced on everything from Europe, to gay rights, to immigration he has recruited a gang of imaginary friends on the internet to harass and threaten me. I found dozens of messages posted on the comments section on my blog, all under different names, but all in the same syntax (typing pattern and spelling habits) that anybody who has ever interacted with him on the internet will recognise as instantly his.They even have the same IP address, but for one deviation which I can assume is his mobile rather than his PC. For example, he uses the term "BMP" where he means BNP, and is consistent with the Facebook Page "Cheryl All" whose identity he has been using to direct people to my site and whip up sympathy for himself. Let's be honest here, is this the actions of a Councillor who has an ounce of sanity? Baksa's grievance with me goes back to when he posted a remark on the forum "Tod Talking" attacking Eastern European immigration, which being made public and I agreed somewhat with I quoted in issue 27 of my newsletter "Fighting Back", he has held a grudge against me ever since. So what sent him crackers this week? He had attempted, unsuccessfully, to get me slung out of a Council meeting, and attempting to get the police to lean on me, he set up a hate page against me because he could not get his way. Knowing something about this man's criminal history I enquired of the Town Council last week how I could find out about "alleged criminal sexual offences of a certain Town Councillor", and despite my doing this in line with Town Council protocol of not naming names, it seems he has gone now berserk. He even made the absurd claim under his fake supermodel girlfriend "Cheryl" that I had posted the remark about Eastern Europeans in his name, despite apologising in his own name afterwards on the same forum, and then apologising at a party disciplinary tribunal shortly afterwards. He even begged me to post the apology on his behalf on Facebook, because the admin wouldn't let him back on. I think this man is due to be measured up for his canvas blazer, don't you? Baksa's anti-immigrant rant on "Tod Talking", again he pretends he is the biggest anti-racist in Todmorden, especially when attacking me. This is the apology he begged me to post on his behalf before he was allowed on to do it himself. Yet now his imaginary supermodel girlfriend "Cheryl" it. claiming I wrote. Myself, NF Chairman Kevin Bryan & Mr Rodney Martin on World View Conversations - Listen here!2/22/2014 http://www.blogtalkradio.com/american-nationalist-network/2014/02/22/world-view-conversations-1
Earlier this week I was invited back on to the show "World View Conversations" with my good friend Mr Rodney Martin, and suggested that we invite a guest from the National Front to give the perspective from those who are organised within a party. It turned out to be an excellent programme, as we got no less than the Chairman of the National Front joining us to discuss: - The tendency of patriots to grasp at straws and vote for phoney plastic patriots like UKIP. - The principles of good leadership vs bad leadership, as well as what should be expected of a party that calls itself nationalist. - The harassment of nationalists by the Police and the other instruments of the system. - Elections, and much more. This is an excellent network that I support and will probably be making my own contribution towards, here is another excellent show that was aired recently, on the same network (about the final solution of where the Jews can have a homeland, separate from us). There is a link to the ANN site on the right-hand tab. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/american-nationalist-network/2014/02/18/the-imperian-mandate--special-jewish-homeland-episode Still going strong, Issue thirty-four of our ever popular newsletter has been written and is due to go to print within the next week.
In this newsletter I am going to be coveringm in detail, the ramifications of the ASDA planning application, viewed within the wider context of the political activities of the market traders. Also I will update you on the ongoing political soap-opera of our mentally unstable Town Councillor, the Liberal Democrats albatross around their necks, "Champagne Chris" Baksa, the lunacy of the latest grants made by the Town Council, and the local elections. As a permanent feature to this site I am going to add an "archive page" of previous Fighting Back newsletters starting with this edition, and they will be published within a fortnight of the leaflets being printed. The picture above is one of the many childish and insulting political propaganda pictures used by some of the people who claim to be Unionists, and this one really made my blood boil. I am a Unionist and the Scots are our brothers, so are the Northern Irish. In fact the Celtic parts of the British Isles are closer to our way of thinking up here in the North of England than the "Torified" South of England. And you can tell that is one of the people who seems to like posting images like this.
It seems that in the unlikely event that the Union did indeed dissolve, it would be thanks to Tory chauvinists thinking the we are "Scotland's master". I would remind people at this point that these same people hold the exact same Thatcherite prejudices against us Northern English as they do against the Scots. I would also remind people that Scotland supplies 40% of our armed forces personnel. So let's just show a little bit of respect eh? I suggest to those who advocate separatism that partitioning of a nation is something that is done to a defeated power or the victim of colour revolution. The list of nations partitioned include; Germany (by the Versailles Treaty) Austria (by the Versailles Treaty) Turkey (by the Versailles Treaty) India (by Muslim Sepratists) Korea (by China) Vietnam (by the United States) Cyprus (by Turkey) Palestine (by the Israelis) Yugoslavia (by Nato) Soviet Union (by Nato) Ireland (by Great Britain) Romania (by the Soviet Union) Sudan (by the African Union) South Africa (by international mandate) Morocco (by Spain) This could be joined by Libya, Egypt, Chad, Ukraine, Iraq, Pakistan, Nigeria and even the United States. This is not the fate of a nation doing well for itself but a victim of a conspiracy to break the world up into a series of mini-states, micro-states, rump states easily ruled by big foreign multi national corporations. |
David JonesFormer member of the Countryside Party, National Front, British People's Party. Archives
April 2014
Categories |